Category Archives: Acting

Character Development: Working as an Ensemble

In his book Stage Acting Techniques: A Practical Guide, John Hester states that “one of the most important truths about acting is that an actor is only ever as good … as the other actors on stage” (2004, p.33).  Hester’s comment can be particularly applied to The Trail. The play requires a significant amount of action from the ensemble, so it is then important that the performers work closely and are comfortable together. To help the company achieve this Lucy, the director, insisted that before each rehearsal the group played team building games. Although these were predominately fun exercises they did help to create a team spirit within the group that we were then able to channel into our rehearsal process. For example: One of Lucy’s games was to get the group together where she would say a particular word/scene and the group would have 30 seconds to make a tableau of that scene. I felt this exercise not only helped the company to work together but also to get into practise of working quickly and smoothly.

The Trial contains many sequences that involve fast paced movements from the performers. For example: The links between the Taxi Sequence, Lift Sequence and Bank Sequence are swift and rely heavily on each performer knowing exactly where they need to be at a particular moment and where they need to move to. So using the exercise we had done with Lucy we applied the quick and confident movements to the sequences allowing the transactions to take place smoothly.

Here are images of our ensemble work during rehearsal:

The team building games throughout the rehearsal process helped us to  improve ourselves individually as actors which then allowed us to develop our skills as an ensemble. Hester’s statement highlights an actor can only be as good as those he acts opposite. By improving ourselves individually as actors we are also empowering the acting of the group as a whole.

Until next time,

Larissa

xxx

 

Work Cited

Hester, John (2004) Stage Acting Techniques: A Practical Guide, The Crowood Press Ltd.

Character Development: The Inspector and Mrs Grubach

From the very start of the company’s rehearsals I have found this production to be incredibly challenging to myself as an actor. I have never taken part in a production that has been so fast paced and has required as much from me physically as well as mentally and emotionally. The Trial necessitates fast moving scene changes and quick character transformations. This in itself is demanding but what adds to the pressure is creating and developing characters that fit within our production’s theme of the grotesque and non-naturalism. Except for Stuart who is performing the play’s protagonist, Joseph K, all actors are multi-rolling. It then becomes important for the actors to make every character they play completely different from the previous.

My first character within the play is that of the Inspector. The audience first see the character delivering news to Joseph K of his arrest but not revealing what K is under arrest for. Lucy suggested the idea of the Inspector displaying characteristics of an old, stereotype image of a school Head teacher. Using this imagery I found myself walking tall with my head held upwards and addressing K as though I was talking down to him. Lucy liked my characterisation, however, felt my movements were to ‘floaty’ and not grotesque enough. Lucy suggested that I re-consider the way I positioned my body and asked me to arch my back. Taking Lucy’s comment into consideration I acted out the scene again and exaggerated  arching my back. I found that keeping my body in this position effected the way I walked. With an arch back my legs became bent and spidery when walking which Lucy felt was perfect for the Inspector as it highlighted a clear difference from K’s natural character.

My second character required a completely different approach. Whereas the Inspector stood with an arched back , Mrs Grubach, K’s landlady, is an elderly, nosey, slightly frail lady. The physicality I created for her was hunched over her knitting needles whilst sitting on a chair. In my opinion there is something quite odd about the character, almost as if she is slightly deranged. Adding onto this I altered my voice to produce a sound which highlighted her elderly persona but also suggested a creepy and eerie quality. K himself notes a difference in the way Mrs Grubach addresses him, so I felt that it was then important to present a character that even the audience finds unsettling. Rodenburg states”Always remember that one of  the actor’s functions is to fill space with presence and with voice” (2002 Rodenburg, p.93). Following Rodenburg’s comment, I believe it is important to consider the voice in every performance. However, I particularly felt it was important in The Trial as the actors were required to present several different characters. The voice helps provide the character with more depth.  I also altered my face to present expressions that would unnerve K by making my eyes wide and exaggerating my smile. Lucy suggested that to make the character appear even more unnerving,  when Mrs Grubach begins talking of what the guards have told her I should to appear as if Mrs Grubach has become lost in her own world. To exaggerate Mrs Grubach’s hunched physicality Lucy directed me to use the chair I was sat on as a Zimmer frame as I exited the stage. I placed my chair several centre metres ahead of me and made small shuffling steps towards it. I did this several times before exiting the stage. When performing this for Lucy she felt I had really captured the grotesque quality of the character and also found my physicality particularly amusing.

Mrs Grubach

The Inspector and Mrs Grubach are just two examples of characters that I will be performing and both highlight the strong physical characteristic demands that this play needs. However, it is also important to consider that The Trial is not a play about the individual actor but a play where the group of performers must work together as an ensemble to successfully create the piece. This is a topic I will explore further in another post.

 

Thanks for reading,

Larissa

x x x

Work Cited

Rodenburg, Patsy (2002) The Actor Speaks: Voice and The Performer, Palgrave Macmillan.

Working with the director.

With Joseph K being such a naturalistic character, it is easy for him to become lost in the foray of absurdity. It is important for me and for the play that the audience connect with Joseph K. He is the character whom they follow throughout the story; if there is no connection, the audience aren’t engaging with the piece. Me and Lucy sat down to discuss the sort of character we wanted our Joseph K to embody, and in what ways we wanted the audience to engage with him.

My main concern is trying to maintain a dramatic presence against such flamboyant characters that are found in the chorus, without slipping K into an unnatural demeanor. This starts mainly with the choices I make as an actor engaging with Joseph K. Bruce Miller states in The Scene Study Book (2010) that ‘actors must make choices for the characters they play, choices that get them closer to what their characters need’ (p. 146) my choices as Joseph K all lead to the conclusion of the play, where K’s emotional and physical capacity is exposed to the audience. Me and Lucy talked in depth about how we wanted our audience to react to K. We decided that the audience had to sympathise with K in order to come away from the play with any specific idea or feeling. If they fail to connect with K on any level then they merely fade away, just as the chorus do at the close of the show.

Director Lucy

Throughout the course of the play K has internal lines which, on reading, Berkoff seems to intend as K’s internals thoughts.  Me and Lucy thought it would be beneficial to explore these moments as asides; in the same way a Shakespearean or Restoration actor would engage with an audience to reveal his or her feelings, we decided that addressing the audience with K’s internal thoughts would generate an intimate response from an audience. They could share in K’s internal humors, ‘They look like tourists’ (Berkoff 1988, p. 14) and laugh with him, or share his fear. This intimacy is what forms the bond and stimulates the thoughts that generate throughout the piece; as the audience travel with K they will hopefully begin to contemplate their own trials and this only strengthens the bond k and the audience share. The main breakthrough for this came in act two of the play when K delivers a speech about preparing his case. The speech seems to be directed at a group of people who are assisting K in writing his defence. I thought that this moment should explore the intensity of K’s plight by sharing it with the audience, ‘we must banish from our minds any thought of my possible guilt. There is no such guilt.‘ (Berkoff 1988, p 49). The ‘we’ suggests that K and the audience are going to fight the law together. Lucy agreed with this choice suggesting me to find any other moments where I could strengthen the connection between audience and K.

 

Work Cited

Miller, B. (2010) The Scene Study Book: Roadmap To Success, Milwaukee: Limelight Editions Ltd.

Berkoff, S. (1988) The Trial, Metamorphosis, In The Penal Colony, London: Gurnsey Press co. Ltd.

 

 

My Role within STAMP

To enable a theatre company to run and produce a show, certain roles need to be assigned to the members of the company. Some examples of roles and teams needed within a theatre company are: a production team, someone to manage its finances (budgeter), a producer (to over look all decisions), a director and the obvious one of actors. Within our company, STAMP Theatre, I have been allocated the roles of lighting director and actress.

When delegating the roles within our company we had to make a team decision of who would do what, and since I had the most experience with lighting (though I do not have much myself) I volunteered myself to be a part of the technical team.

Often in theatre companies people will double role to save the cost of paying two people when one person could do both jobs. This obviously is not the case in our company, as no one is getting paid however, we have chosen to multi-role within our company because most of us wanted to act therefore, like a professional company some of us had more than one role.

As lighting director it is my job to transpose the ideas of the artistic designer to the technicians at our venue in a way that is understandable. I need to create various documents that will provide our venue with the knowledge to create the lighting settings we want. The documentation I need to provide is, a Lighting plot (also known as an LX plot), a magic sheet and a focus chart. Each document will need to be in a generic format that the technicians at various venues will be able to understand – if we were to tour the production, this would save making a new focus chart each time.

 

Thank you for reading,

 

Emma Huggins

Joseph K – The naturalistic man in the surreal world

So, I am to play the role of Joseph K in STAMP Theatre’s upcoming production of Steven Berkoff’s The Trial. Having just read through the script I am concerned as to how I will portray such a naturalistic character in what is such  a surreal world. It will be a difficult process and I worry that he may become lost in the fray of flamboyance that will be occurring on stage. But then maybe that is Berkoff’s intention; that K becomes lost within the law itself as he aims to find out what he is accused of. On the surface it is difficult to find any form of beginning for K. He seems like a man who is stuck in an empty life which consists of sleep, work and the occasional fling with Elsa. Joseph K seems to me to be an everyman who has no ego, and in the end does not succeed in his quest, ‘Man cannot live without a lasting trust of something indestructible within himself’ (Berkoff 988, p. 11). Joseph K does not have this belief and in my first reading, I perceived this to be the reason why the play unfolds in such a manner.

Berkoff states in the preface to the play that ‘The Trial is my life. It is anyone’s trial. It is the trial of actually creating the production(1998, p. 5). Perhaps I will be able to understand the character of Joseph K as this process develops and I begin my own trial of morphing Joseph K into a real character.

Work Cited.

Berkoff, S. (1988) The Trial, Metamorphosis, In The Penal Colony, London: Guernsey Press Co. Ltd.