Category Archives: Stage Management

Stage Manager’s Performance Day Analysis

From the perspective of a Stage Manager the performance day as a whole was a fantastic experience. As STAMP’s Technical Rider requested, the company were allowed into the theatre the evening before to pre-rig as well as set up the frames. In doing this the following day was made easier as the LPAC technicians only needed to focus the lights, which then allowed the company to go straight into a cue to cue run.

As the Stage Manager for this performance one of my main concerns on the day was to make sure all the props were in their correct position. Alex has mentioned in a previous post that our set included two hat stands positioned one on either side of the stage in which I placed the props on. I believed it was important to place the props in a way that would allow each performer to attain them as quickly and efficiently as possible.

After we had set up the stage the company was then able to do a complete run through of the play including the lights and the props. As this was the first time the company had done a run through on the stage with props and lights we were not expecting it to run smoothly, but we were all pleasantly surprised. I had made sure the company had rehearsed with props before the actual performance day, which enabled all the performers to be confident when collecting them from the stands. However, there were some slight changes in regards to the set. Taking advice from the LPAC Technicians, instead of using the black rope as well as the bungee cord for the frames we just used the bungee cord. This allowed the frames to be stretched in exactly the way we had wanted them to be. On the other hand due to the differing levels of the frames it made the back ones difficult to come to the front of the stage without the performer placing significant weight on them, as was the case in the ‘Bank Scene’. Lucy then suggested we act out this scene exactly how we had done during the rehearsals and not actually use the frames in that section. Although everyone seemed a bit unsure at first, during the run it worked perfectly and we carried it on into the final performance. Another useful thing we decided to carry on into the performance was marking the position of the chairs on stage. The chairs were constantly moved throughout the production but as we had specific spot lights on the frames it was important that all chairs were placed back in the correct positions under the spots. Having used tape during rehearsals to highlight chairs and frames I felt it would be a good idea to do the same for the actual performance. Doing this helped the actors find their places on stage quickly.

At the end of the performance I completed a show report to summaries how the production went:

The Trial Show Report

 

Overall the day was a great success. The company had everything we needed to allow the performance and the day as a whole to run smoothly. With help from the LPAC Technicians the set and lights were set up swiftly allowing for the company to have significant rehearsal time on the stage. STAMP’s debut performance would not have been the success it was without the help of the LPAC staff.

Thanks for reading,

Larissa

xxx

STAMP’s Technical Rider Form

To maintain a positive relationship between a Theatre Company and a performance Venue it is important that the company produce the necessary documentation. In this post I am referring directly to the Technical Rider. The Technical Rider is a form of documentation that provides the details of the specific requirements a touring company will need for their production, such as set, props and lighting. Peter Maccoy states in his book Essentials of a Stage Manager that “Technical riders are most effective when worded to be as helpful and informative as possible. The language should be simple rather than legalistic” (p.245). With Maccoy’s statement in mind I began creating STAMP Theatre’s Technical Rider.

It is important to send a company’s Technical Rider to the theatre a month in advance of the actual performance. This provides the technicians at the venue with time to prepare for the company’s arrival, especially if they will need to source any prop items or lights. In order to fill this out as detailed as possible I made contact with LPAC’s Stage Manager, Darren Page, and asked for a detailed document containing all the LPAC Technical Specifications:

LPAC Technical Specifications

From this document I was able to ascertain the width and height of the stage, the style of staging, storage space and the specific lights, all of which were helpful when drawing up STAMP’s Technical Rider and enabled myself to make any adjustments if necessary.

STAMP’s Technical Rider was as followed:The Trial Technical Rider

STAMP Tech Rider 1STAMP Tech Rider 2

As you can observe from the document above, STAMP’s rider covered Stage Area, Set, Properties, Lighting, Operation, Time In Venue, Get Out and Secure Storage. These areas are important to specify clearly as the productions success relies on their accuracy. For STAMP Theatre my main concern was the building of the picture frames and the storing of the larger set objects. Although I had been to see Darren about them previously and he had kindly offered to attach the bungee cord and hang the frames from the top of the stage himself, I wanted to make sure Darren received all materials necessary to produce them. Along with Assistant Stage Manger, Alex Harvey Sporle, we sourced the materials necessary and gave them to Darren a month before the performance. On top of this the company needed somewhere to store the frames and bungee cord as well as the door frame and hat stands. From the LPAC Technical Specifications document I was able to surmise that there would be space to store these objects at LPAC and after discussing this with Darren the company was able to do so.

On completion of the Technical Rider I forwarded the document to Darren as soon as possible. As I previously mentioned it is important to provide the performance information to the venue in advance. In doing this I felt the company had an instant positive relationship with the LPAC staff allowing for the production set up to be a smooth transaction for all.

Thank you for reading,

Larissa

xxx

 

Work Cited

Maccoy, Peter (2004) Essentials of Stage Management, A & C Black Publishers Ltd.

 

Risk Assessment

In Essentials of Stage Management Peter Maccoy explains that ‘The HCE [Health Care Equipment]  defines a risk assessment as ‘nothing more than a careful examination of what, in your work, could cause harm to people, so that you can weigh up whether you have taken enough precautions or should do more to prevent harm. The aim is to make sure that no one gets hurt or becomes ill’ (2004, p. 217.) With this in mind I began designing the risk assessment for our show. Due to our show having minimal staging this process did not take very much and  he fact that I also act in the show made this process even easier, as being an actor myself I could imagine all of the possible dangers that could occur to myself and the rest of the cast. The main issue was the use of the picture frames, which were attached to the bungee cord. Since we had not been able to rehearse with them in this way we were not used to the constraints that moving them around the stage had.

 

The Trial Risk Assessment

 

Thanks for reading, Alex.

Works Cited

Maccoy, Peter (2004) Essentials of Stage Management, A & C Black Publishers.

 

Floor Plan

Due to the minimalist style we were incorporating into our piece the stage was almost bare save for four chairs, two hatstands, the door frame and the eight hanging picture frames. Originally we planned on having a box at the back of the stage which would contain each characters props, but we felt that it may take too long to find each desired prop in the box. So Lucy thought up the idea of introducing two hat stands (which Joe sourced for us) onto the stage, this way the props could be found instantly, meaning the fast pace that we wanted throughout the performance would not drop. Having the hatstands at the front of the stage also brought more of the action towards the front of the stage meaning it could be seen better. In order to communicate to the technical team at the LPAC what our stage would look like I created a floor plan. The floor plan is also important when looking at the lighting plot and focus sheets as it helps show where everything is situated on the stage and puts the light placements into perspective.
trialfloorplan

Thanks for reading,  Alex.

Making The Doorframe

‘Before the door stands the doorkeeper. Before the doorkeeper stands the figure of Joseph K, waiting to gain admittance to the Law’  (Berkoff 1988, P. 11.)

The presence of the door is incredibly significant in The Trial as it represents Joesph K’s internal struggle to understand what is happening around him. With this in mind it was important we create the correct look for the door frame.

Today Larissa – Stage Manager, Lucy -Director, Alex Watson -Producer and myself organized a meeting with one of the LPAC technicians, Martin, to start building the door frame for the performance. From a previous meeting we had discovered that LPAC already had a door frame which they were happy for us to use. This made our lives easier as it meant we did not need to source it from somewhere else.

Before

However, we soon found that the frame was slightly too short. We asked the technician helping us if he could extend the top of the frame. The next thing to do was to attach wheels onto the bottom of the frame. There were some castor wheels in the workshop, but they were not the right size to fit onto the bottom of the frame. So Larissa and I went to B&Q , where I bought four new Castor wheels. While Alex and Lucy began to paint the frame black. The frame needs to be able to move easily as several of the actors move the frame throughout the performance to indicate scene changes. The wheels Martin used allows for the frame to be moved fluidly which will allow for quick and smooth scene changes.

DSC05091 2.Wheel On Wood

DSC05106 DSC05098 DSC05101

Darren, the Stage Manager of LPAC,  told us that that no other company or future show will be needing the frame and so informed us that we could take it away from LPAC to rehearse with. This was great news for us as we had already found rehearsing without an actual frame difficult. Including the door frame in rehearsals will allow actors, as well as Lucy the director, to clearly see where the frame stands on stage in relation to the other props and actors. Using props early in the rehearsal process is vital as it gives more time for actors to become accustomed to them and know how they impact on the actual performance. With this in mind Larissa, and myself have agreed to meet up very soon and discuss sourcing the rest of the props that we will need.

 

Thank you for reading,  Alex.

 

Works Cited

Berkoff, Steven (1988) The Trial, Metamorphosis and In The Penal Colony, Amber Lane Press.