Category Archives: Larissa Oates

Stage Manager’s Performance Day Analysis

From the perspective of a Stage Manager the performance day as a whole was a fantastic experience. As STAMP’s Technical Rider requested, the company were allowed into the theatre the evening before to pre-rig as well as set up the frames. In doing this the following day was made easier as the LPAC technicians only needed to focus the lights, which then allowed the company to go straight into a cue to cue run.

As the Stage Manager for this performance one of my main concerns on the day was to make sure all the props were in their correct position. Alex has mentioned in a previous post that our set included two hat stands positioned one on either side of the stage in which I placed the props on. I believed it was important to place the props in a way that would allow each performer to attain them as quickly and efficiently as possible.

After we had set up the stage the company was then able to do a complete run through of the play including the lights and the props. As this was the first time the company had done a run through on the stage with props and lights we were not expecting it to run smoothly, but we were all pleasantly surprised. I had made sure the company had rehearsed with props before the actual performance day, which enabled all the performers to be confident when collecting them from the stands. However, there were some slight changes in regards to the set. Taking advice from the LPAC Technicians, instead of using the black rope as well as the bungee cord for the frames we just used the bungee cord. This allowed the frames to be stretched in exactly the way we had wanted them to be. On the other hand due to the differing levels of the frames it made the back ones difficult to come to the front of the stage without the performer placing significant weight on them, as was the case in the ‘Bank Scene’. Lucy then suggested we act out this scene exactly how we had done during the rehearsals and not actually use the frames in that section. Although everyone seemed a bit unsure at first, during the run it worked perfectly and we carried it on into the final performance. Another useful thing we decided to carry on into the performance was marking the position of the chairs on stage. The chairs were constantly moved throughout the production but as we had specific spot lights on the frames it was important that all chairs were placed back in the correct positions under the spots. Having used tape during rehearsals to highlight chairs and frames I felt it would be a good idea to do the same for the actual performance. Doing this helped the actors find their places on stage quickly.

At the end of the performance I completed a show report to summaries how the production went:

The Trial Show Report

 

Overall the day was a great success. The company had everything we needed to allow the performance and the day as a whole to run smoothly. With help from the LPAC Technicians the set and lights were set up swiftly allowing for the company to have significant rehearsal time on the stage. STAMP’s debut performance would not have been the success it was without the help of the LPAC staff.

Thanks for reading,

Larissa

xxx

STAMP’s Technical Rider Form

To maintain a positive relationship between a Theatre Company and a performance Venue it is important that the company produce the necessary documentation. In this post I am referring directly to the Technical Rider. The Technical Rider is a form of documentation that provides the details of the specific requirements a touring company will need for their production, such as set, props and lighting. Peter Maccoy states in his book Essentials of a Stage Manager that “Technical riders are most effective when worded to be as helpful and informative as possible. The language should be simple rather than legalistic” (p.245). With Maccoy’s statement in mind I began creating STAMP Theatre’s Technical Rider.

It is important to send a company’s Technical Rider to the theatre a month in advance of the actual performance. This provides the technicians at the venue with time to prepare for the company’s arrival, especially if they will need to source any prop items or lights. In order to fill this out as detailed as possible I made contact with LPAC’s Stage Manager, Darren Page, and asked for a detailed document containing all the LPAC Technical Specifications:

LPAC Technical Specifications

From this document I was able to ascertain the width and height of the stage, the style of staging, storage space and the specific lights, all of which were helpful when drawing up STAMP’s Technical Rider and enabled myself to make any adjustments if necessary.

STAMP’s Technical Rider was as followed:The Trial Technical Rider

STAMP Tech Rider 1STAMP Tech Rider 2

As you can observe from the document above, STAMP’s rider covered Stage Area, Set, Properties, Lighting, Operation, Time In Venue, Get Out and Secure Storage. These areas are important to specify clearly as the productions success relies on their accuracy. For STAMP Theatre my main concern was the building of the picture frames and the storing of the larger set objects. Although I had been to see Darren about them previously and he had kindly offered to attach the bungee cord and hang the frames from the top of the stage himself, I wanted to make sure Darren received all materials necessary to produce them. Along with Assistant Stage Manger, Alex Harvey Sporle, we sourced the materials necessary and gave them to Darren a month before the performance. On top of this the company needed somewhere to store the frames and bungee cord as well as the door frame and hat stands. From the LPAC Technical Specifications document I was able to surmise that there would be space to store these objects at LPAC and after discussing this with Darren the company was able to do so.

On completion of the Technical Rider I forwarded the document to Darren as soon as possible. As I previously mentioned it is important to provide the performance information to the venue in advance. In doing this I felt the company had an instant positive relationship with the LPAC staff allowing for the production set up to be a smooth transaction for all.

Thank you for reading,

Larissa

xxx

 

Work Cited

Maccoy, Peter (2004) Essentials of Stage Management, A & C Black Publishers Ltd.

 

Video Blog: Cue Script

Here are some example images of the cue script we created:

Thank you for watching,

 

Emma Huggins and Larissa Oates

Character Development: Working as an Ensemble

In his book Stage Acting Techniques: A Practical Guide, John Hester states that “one of the most important truths about acting is that an actor is only ever as good … as the other actors on stage” (2004, p.33).  Hester’s comment can be particularly applied to The Trail. The play requires a significant amount of action from the ensemble, so it is then important that the performers work closely and are comfortable together. To help the company achieve this Lucy, the director, insisted that before each rehearsal the group played team building games. Although these were predominately fun exercises they did help to create a team spirit within the group that we were then able to channel into our rehearsal process. For example: One of Lucy’s games was to get the group together where she would say a particular word/scene and the group would have 30 seconds to make a tableau of that scene. I felt this exercise not only helped the company to work together but also to get into practise of working quickly and smoothly.

The Trial contains many sequences that involve fast paced movements from the performers. For example: The links between the Taxi Sequence, Lift Sequence and Bank Sequence are swift and rely heavily on each performer knowing exactly where they need to be at a particular moment and where they need to move to. So using the exercise we had done with Lucy we applied the quick and confident movements to the sequences allowing the transactions to take place smoothly.

Here are images of our ensemble work during rehearsal:

The team building games throughout the rehearsal process helped us to  improve ourselves individually as actors which then allowed us to develop our skills as an ensemble. Hester’s statement highlights an actor can only be as good as those he acts opposite. By improving ourselves individually as actors we are also empowering the acting of the group as a whole.

Until next time,

Larissa

xxx

 

Work Cited

Hester, John (2004) Stage Acting Techniques: A Practical Guide, The Crowood Press Ltd.

Character Development: The Inspector and Mrs Grubach

From the very start of the company’s rehearsals I have found this production to be incredibly challenging to myself as an actor. I have never taken part in a production that has been so fast paced and has required as much from me physically as well as mentally and emotionally. The Trial necessitates fast moving scene changes and quick character transformations. This in itself is demanding but what adds to the pressure is creating and developing characters that fit within our production’s theme of the grotesque and non-naturalism. Except for Stuart who is performing the play’s protagonist, Joseph K, all actors are multi-rolling. It then becomes important for the actors to make every character they play completely different from the previous.

My first character within the play is that of the Inspector. The audience first see the character delivering news to Joseph K of his arrest but not revealing what K is under arrest for. Lucy suggested the idea of the Inspector displaying characteristics of an old, stereotype image of a school Head teacher. Using this imagery I found myself walking tall with my head held upwards and addressing K as though I was talking down to him. Lucy liked my characterisation, however, felt my movements were to ‘floaty’ and not grotesque enough. Lucy suggested that I re-consider the way I positioned my body and asked me to arch my back. Taking Lucy’s comment into consideration I acted out the scene again and exaggerated  arching my back. I found that keeping my body in this position effected the way I walked. With an arch back my legs became bent and spidery when walking which Lucy felt was perfect for the Inspector as it highlighted a clear difference from K’s natural character.

My second character required a completely different approach. Whereas the Inspector stood with an arched back , Mrs Grubach, K’s landlady, is an elderly, nosey, slightly frail lady. The physicality I created for her was hunched over her knitting needles whilst sitting on a chair. In my opinion there is something quite odd about the character, almost as if she is slightly deranged. Adding onto this I altered my voice to produce a sound which highlighted her elderly persona but also suggested a creepy and eerie quality. K himself notes a difference in the way Mrs Grubach addresses him, so I felt that it was then important to present a character that even the audience finds unsettling. Rodenburg states”Always remember that one of  the actor’s functions is to fill space with presence and with voice” (2002 Rodenburg, p.93). Following Rodenburg’s comment, I believe it is important to consider the voice in every performance. However, I particularly felt it was important in The Trial as the actors were required to present several different characters. The voice helps provide the character with more depth.  I also altered my face to present expressions that would unnerve K by making my eyes wide and exaggerating my smile. Lucy suggested that to make the character appear even more unnerving,  when Mrs Grubach begins talking of what the guards have told her I should to appear as if Mrs Grubach has become lost in her own world. To exaggerate Mrs Grubach’s hunched physicality Lucy directed me to use the chair I was sat on as a Zimmer frame as I exited the stage. I placed my chair several centre metres ahead of me and made small shuffling steps towards it. I did this several times before exiting the stage. When performing this for Lucy she felt I had really captured the grotesque quality of the character and also found my physicality particularly amusing.

Mrs Grubach

The Inspector and Mrs Grubach are just two examples of characters that I will be performing and both highlight the strong physical characteristic demands that this play needs. However, it is also important to consider that The Trial is not a play about the individual actor but a play where the group of performers must work together as an ensemble to successfully create the piece. This is a topic I will explore further in another post.

 

Thanks for reading,

Larissa

x x x

Work Cited

Rodenburg, Patsy (2002) The Actor Speaks: Voice and The Performer, Palgrave Macmillan.